chevron-down chevron-left chevron-right chevron-up home circle comment double-caret-left double-caret-right like like2 twitter epale-arrow-up text-bubble cloud stop caret-down caret-up caret-left caret-right file-text

EPALE

Plateforme électronique pour l'éducation et la formation des adultes en Europe

 
 

Ressource

To Game or not to Game – a pilot study on the use of gamification for team allocation in entrepreneurship education

Langue: EN

Posté par Giulia COLOMBO

“A need for a well-balanced team” is a well-known adage, be it in sports, organizations or startups. There are numerous studies that suggest which type of teams perform better than others for a certain task, but the process of that team formation itself is rather unexplored and next to non-existent in the educational literature.

Furthermore, educators burdened by course loads and schedules tend to opt for the easiest method of team formation – a random allocation or self-selection by the participants. Taking into account well known benefits of diversity in teams, we have tried to explore team allocation by educators and the use of gamification to try and answer the question - Is it possible to make team allocation easier for the educators as well as more fun for the students? We compare a serious gaming solution with an intensive instructorselection method for team allocation. This pilot study finds that the game-allocated teams performed equally as the instructor-selection method, but the former saved time for the educator while being fun for the students. While there were some hints that the game-allocated teams performed marginally better than the instructor-selectionallocated teams, further studies need to be done to confirm our hypothesis.

Auteur(s) de la ressource: 
Rajiv Vaid Basaiawmoit, Eszter Somos, Ervin Szalai, Kata Szabo, Taru Deva
Date de publication:
Mercredi, 4 Novembre, 2015
Langue du document
Type de ressource: 
Étude de cas
Pays:
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Epale SoundCloud Share on LinkedIn