European Commission logo
Log in Create an account
Each keyword is searched for in the content.

EPALE - Electronic Platform for Adult Learning in Europe

Blog

The Value of Family Learning

The positive impact of family learning on children and adults is commonly accepted, but as “ring- fenced” funding has ceased, and family learning competes within the wide range of adult community learning and skills provision for a share from ever decreasing pots of funding is there a need to provide more evidence to demonstrate its impact?

Learning_5

 

Family Learning has traditionally been embraced as an effective means of addressing the learning needs of children and adults. Advocates, stress the “double-impact” of working with two generations together to break the cycle of underachievement in basic skills. Many parents return to learning to support their children and in turn are inspired to improve their own skills. Children’s achievements subsequently increase as a result of the support and encouragement they receive from their parents along with the development of a learning environment at home. The evidence to support this view however has mostly been qualitative in the form of case studies, reports from providers and small- scale surveys. It is a challenge to gather sufficient quantitative evidence nationally because family learning is delivered in a range of models by a variety of providers. 

Evidence and Research 

Longitudinal data is not easily collected but the impact of the family learning interventions is often not seen until months or even years after a course has finished. For example, a parent finding employment, enrolling on to a further education course or a child improving their test scores in reading or numeracy. 

Whilst learner satisfaction data is collected through the Education and Skills Funding Agency’s FE Choices annual survey the responses from family learning participants are not made readily available nationally or even to providers. Researchers and providers are also challenged by the range of wider impacts that family learning can achieve. Whilst improvements in basic skills are often seen as the most frequent achievements, family learning also contributes to a range of wider impacts on family relationships, employment, social mobility, health and well-being.

In England, the National Family Learning Forum together with the Department of Education and FLLAG (the Family Learning Local Authority group) are working on ways to collect substantial and meaningful evidence to make the case for family learning. A survey of family learning parents and tutors will commence in 2018, building on previous annual surveys organised by FLLAG. The aim is to capture the wider benefits including employment, health and well-being in addition to data about the educational achievements of parents and children.

NALA Family Learning Conference

In November 2017 I was fortunate to attend the NALA (National Adult Literacy Agency) Family Learning Conference in Dublin. I found out that adult and community learning providers in Ireland are also challenged by this issue. As DEIS (Delivering Equality of Opportunity in Schools) funding ceased in 2014 some districts in Ireland have either stopped or reduced their delivery of family learning. Practitioners feel the need to provide substantial impact evidence to support their funding applications.

Family Learning and the European Year of Cultural Heritage 

In 2018, the European Year of Cultural Heritage we should consider the links between family learning and arts and cultural education.  Many families experience the joy of creative arts or visits to cultural centres as part of a family learning group, for some this is their first such experience. There are many examples of innovative family learning taking place in museums, libraries and theatres. Programmes such as the BBC’s Terrific Scientific are helping to widening the family learning curriculum in many directions.

The challenge, as is often the case with educational research, is to justify the cost of collecting the evidence whilst the funding for provision has reduced. The costs include staff time, good will of both staff and students as well as the actual costs of surveys, telephone calls and the collation of results.

There is already a wealth of evidence that should not be ignored or discarded. Learning and Work Institute produced a useful summary of evidence to date in the UK in 2013. A study of family literacy programmes in England carried out by the National Research and Development Centre for Adult Literacy and Numeracy (NRDC) was published in 2015 and there are numerous reports on small scale research in this area. You can find more information by clicking on the link here: http://www.learningandwork.org.uk/resource/family-learning-inquiry/

Should we simply accept from the evidence already available or seek to build on the evidence base in new and creative ways? It would be interesting to know how family learning in other European countries is funded and how evidence is collected. 

About the Author 

Ac33bdec-fa39-4c95-a42b-0056619c0c25_2

 

Cath Harcula has been involved in adult learning for over 30 years, Cath is currently the chair for the National Family Learning Forum in England and is also an Ambassador for EPALE UK. Read more about Cath here.

 

 

 

You may also be interested in: 

Inter-generational impact of adult learning on families in the UK (blog)

Family Learning - A model of success (blog)

Who cares about basic skills? (blog)

Become an EPALE UK Ambassador! (blog)

What does learning mean to you? #CelebratingEPALE3 (blog)

Likeme (2)
Themes addressed

Comments

Thank you Cath,
for explaining the very successful 'two for one' approach which is used in family learning. This should be rolled out everywhere as an excellent value for money intervention, breaking down silos, working together across government sectors and benefiting priority groups in a very positive and empowering way.
In Ireland, there were two streams of DEIS (Delivering Equality of Opportunity in Schools) funding to support people living in disadvantaged areas: one to schools and a much smaller amount (which was applied for annually and reported on in detail) to the adult literacy service.  This funded working with parents of children in these more disadvantaged schools. The latter funding has now being absorbed into the mainstream adult literacy budget, of the literacy schemes successful in getting funding in 2014. As a result there is no code to show which funding is adult literacy or family learning and there is no separate reporting required. Family learning work has effectively disappeared. There has been a marked drop off in family learning work in some areas with higher pressure being placed on skills for employment. It is hoped we can revive the intervention with those who believe in it's worth and gather evidence of it's impact locally. I would like to try to gather evidence in new and exciting ways as Cath suggests. I would be interested in working together with others on this.
Likeme (0)

Login or Sign up to join the conversation.