chevron-down chevron-left chevron-right chevron-up home circle comment double-caret-left double-caret-right like like2 twitter epale-arrow-up text-bubble cloud stop caret-down caret-up caret-left caret-right file-text

EPALE - Electronic Platform for Adult Learning in Europe

Blog

The reality of the eSkills agenda

16/10/2014
by Mary-Clare O'CONNOR
Language: EN

No one can doubt that reducing the digital divide is a key priority for the EU. The sheer volume of initiatives which involve this objective – such as the 'Digital Agenda for Europe', 'an Agenda for New Skills and Jobs', Europe 2020 flagships, the communications on 'Opening up Education' and on employment 'Towards a job-rich recovery', and the 'Grand Coalition for Digital Jobs' –are a testament to this commitment (see figure below).

/en/files/skills-mappng-0Skills map.png

Skills Map

Nor can the rationale for such interventions be questioned. According to the 2014 digital agenda scoreboard, 47% of Europeans have low or no digital skills whilst 23% of Europeans have no digital skills at all. Conversely, the deficit of ICT professional skills is expected to reach nearly one million by 2020.  Further, the recent ‘eSkills for Jobs in Europe: Measuring progress and moving ahead’ has shown that 50% of EU Member States are currently only exhibiting model levels of policy activity on e-skills for competitive, growth and jobs.

Perhaps we are in need of a reality check here. Educational policies are entirely in the hands of national governments. The European Commission can and does attempt to influence these policies through their trusted ‘naming and shaming’ tool, for instance, by publishing surveys and studies in which the worst performers would feel pushed in a race to the top. There is no quick fix, however. Experience has shown that the best performers have put in place long-term strategic approaches, fostered multi-stakeholder partnerships and developed a host of carefully designed eskills related measures and initiatives. Even with EU funding or through national sources, activities that are not embedded in a coherent national policy in a longer term perspective struggle to survive after the initial funding comes to an end.

With this in mind, the aforementioned ‘eSkills for Jobs in Europe’ report contains a whole host of best practice examples of initiatives and measures worth examining, including:

  • The Finish IT project in Germany, which has a range of public and private partners, explicitly targets ICT dropouts to complete a one-year programme combining ICT qualification modules with a placement at a company.
  • The Evoliris ICT Reference Centre of the Brussels Region in Belgium acts as an interface between all actors in ICT employment policies. It also carries out VET courses, job screening and matching services, as well as developing a set of ‘intermediate e-skills’ requested by employers.
  • The Nokia Bridge Program in Finland was enacted by the firm following the layoff of 5,000 employees. It offers outplacement services (i.e. career counselling), as well as skill specific training and learning opportunities. Bridge also offers start-up funding, exposure to investors, and entrepreneurship training to those with a new business idea in need of backing (which has resulted in 1,000 business start-ups worldwide).

In sum, whilst the solid knowledge base that the EU offers in this area is vital, active steps in reducing eskills deficits can only be enacted by national (and regional) governments, in collaboration with the relevant VET and employment actors in each respective country.

________________

Aaron Rajania is a senior research consultant in Ecorys UK, with a specific focus on education and employment policy and research work. Specific research areas include teacher training systems, learning pathways, quality assurance frameworks, and skills development in a work setting. He has lived and worked in a number of countries in Europe including Belgium, Germany, Hungary and the UK.

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Epale SoundCloud Share on LinkedIn Share on email
Refresh comments Enable auto refresh

Displaying 1 - 3 of 3
  • Aaron Rajania's picture

    Hi Graciela, thanks for your comments. I was aware of the relatively quick progress Estonia has made in e-learning particularly in the use of ICT learning materials (though I must admit mainly in terms of school education mainly through the e-school platform: http://e-estonia.com/component/e-school/ ). In relation to adult learning, I have also heard of the Estonian e-Vocational School consortium (http://www.e-ope.ee/) - is there any other initiatives in relation to adult learning in Estonia that are worth looking at?

  • Graciela Sbertoli's picture

    Hi, Aaron, and sorry for being so late with my answer. We should really ask some Estonian experts for documentation, but to my knowledge what makes Estonia interesting in the context of ICT in Adult Learning is that the country's policy of total digitalization of government pressed them to ensure that the whole of the population did have access and the necessary competence to make use of the technology. Digital competence is both a tool for further learning and a learning target in itself, since (especially in a country like Estonia) it has become a prerequisite for active citizenship. Check this article in The Economist: http://www.economist.com/blogs/economist-explains/2013/07/economist-expl... I find it particularly interesting that "the government declared internet access to be a human right". An interesting case study can be found at http://e-estonia.com/case_studie/healthy-lives-better-lives/.

  • Graciela Sbertoli's picture
    Thank you for this interesting take on this issue. I thoroughly agree with you that a European Digital revolution demands cohesive digital policies at governmental level in each member state. I wonder if you are familiar with the case of Estonia, a country that achieved an incredible digital leap in very few years. Worth studying!