chevron-down chevron-left chevron-right chevron-up home circle comment double-caret-left double-caret-right like like2 twitter epale-arrow-up text-bubble cloud stop caret-down caret-up caret-left caret-right file-text

EPALE - Electronic Platform for Adult Learning in Europe


The challenge of plain language: Adult learning for people with reading problems?

by Michael Sommer
Language: EN
Document available also in: DE RO NL EL HU

Reading time approximately 4 minutes—read, like, comment!

Original language: German

According to the latest LEO study, 6.2 million people in Germany are not able to read or write properly. So as not to exclude this less literate group, plain language (known as Leichte Sprache in German) was developed. With its help adult learning can reach these people too. Texts of this type try to impart the most important details in words and sentence structures that are as easy to read as possible.


Leichte Sprache

This is the example of a booklet, which translates to:

Peter is 47 years old. He is a bricklayer.

He has not had a job for six years. He goes to the job center.

There they advise him. He has attended a course.

Now he can cover a roof. He has a job as a roofer.

Labour market project with booklets in plain language

As part of a labour market project that aims to use a wide range of methods to find work placements for people with a severe disability, I recently familiarised myself with the concept of plain language. This resulted in a booklet that serves as a local guide, showing people how to deal with their job centre and agencies for work, and, ultimately, how to find a new job.

The actual learning effect here was not just for the people using the brochure but rather for the authors themselves. The Netzwerk Leichte Sprache (Network for Plain Language in Germany) laid down quite clear rules in 2006. Implementing these rules (see the EPALE examples below) is, even for gifted writers, difficult and unfamiliar. However, the most difficult aspect is applying, in an extremely radical manner, the two old and fundamental rules of every information transfer: simplify and reduce.

Reduction and simplification

Even in the regular communication of information—such as in journalism and in adult learning—complex contexts have to be remodelled into an understandable and interesting form. This “reduction of complexity” is a decisive process that is often criticised. (“But half of the article is missing!”) When it comes to plain language, the information is boiled down to its minimal core message. This means it is necessary to decide “What are actually the most important parts?” Our team at the labour market project talked more about these questions than about the vocabulary and phrasing of the brochure. The debate became particularly heated when it came to terminology and sentence constructions that are standard or even (legally) predefined. Our solution was using simple but clear examples to present the content. Instead of, for example: “Hans completed an occupational rehabilitation”, we used this example reformulation: “Hans had an accident. He cannot do his old job anymore. He has to learn a new job.”

Basic principles of plain language

The next aspect of plain language is vocabulary. It is best to use a set of understandable foundation words that can be used again and again. The sentence structure should be as simple as possible (subject, predicate, object), and both clauses and passive constructions should be avoided. In our case, working in German, the most controversial and unfamiliar aspects for all writers are the splitting of composites, i.e. Erwachsenenbildung (adult learning) becomes Erwachsenen-Bildung, and the use of foreign loan words in phonetic language: Computer becomes Kompjuta. When a text like this has been written, it should be read by people who use plain language. The city and district commissioners for matters relating to persons with disabilities or the employees of relevant associations are happy to help in this respect.

EPALE—in plain language

So how would EPALE be described in plain language? Perhaps like this:

EPALE is a platform on the Internet. There are many texts about adult learning. Everyone can read EPALE with the computer.

The word EPALE is an abbreviation. It means: “Electronic Platform for Adult Learning in Europe”.

Everyone can put their own text on EPALE. The texts should be about learning for adults. This includes many topics. For example: How do I learn a new language? Many people are poor. How can they go to courses? How can teachers get more trained? How will we learn in the future?

Everyone can find out more about adult learning. EPALE is free to use. There are articles, news, and tips. Everyone can write what they think about other texts.

EPALE is five years old. EPALE is in many countries in Europe. It is paid for by the European Union.

Ultimately, plain language is intended to make information accessible to as many people as possible. When approaching the topic it becomes clear how important it is to adopt the reader’s perspective. Is it really possible for everyone to understand information in a text when they all have different levels of experience? The penchant for flowery language, elegant expressions or sophisticated academic jargon should retreat—humbled—into the background.

Log in to join the discussion!

EPALE-Botschafter Michael Sommer

About the author:

Dr. Michael Sommer is a journalist and was a research associate in journalism and pedagogy for five years. Since 1993, he has been a journalist and press secretary for the Akademie Klausenhof and the Catholic Adult Education of Germany (KEB), and editor-in-chief of the Erwachsenenbildung magazine. He is also involved in media-pedagogical education and is active in European projects. He is also an EPALE ambassador.

Related articles:

Das Kompositum – eine bedrohte Art (DE)


Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Epale SoundCloud Share on LinkedIn Share on email
Refresh comments Enable auto refresh

Displaying 1 - 8 of 8
  • Angela D'Arcy's picture
    I found this blog very interesting.  I work with adults with disabilities and I have had to take care of the words I use to make sure that I am understood.  We had a group workshop two years ago with our students and found that the majority of the group did not understand or remember acronyms.  We use acronyms a lot in our work as they are time-saving, but I am much more aware now of the need to clarify and explain.
  • Michael Sommer's picture
    Dear Angela, thanks for your comment! I think that we Germans prefer to write in a complicated academic way. We like passive voice, long sentences, endless words. It was very helpful for me to come back to the roots and write as for children. Anyway inclusion and accessibility are often neglected topics in German adult education. The use of Plain Language is one part of the story.
  • Maren Lohrer's picture

    Acronyms are a very good example for exclusive language. They can save time, but are only understood by someone with previous knowledge. During my journalistic training I learned that one has to give the long version once and the acronym in brackets, before using the acronym further on. But that was „old school“, in times of twitter one uses lots of those abbrevations (acronyms, shorter homophons like „U2“ instead of „you, too“, etc.) without explanations.

    By the way: IMHO and AFAIK I am AFK now :-)
  • Maren Lohrer's picture
    In dem sehr informativen Beitrag wird auch auf die Level-One Studie (LEO 2018) hingewiesen. Diese Studie erfasst auch die Beteiligung an Weiterbildung. Es zeigt sich, dass die Weiterbildungsquote von Erwachsenen, die deutliche Defizite im Lesen und Schreiben haben („gering literalisiert“), kleiner ist als die der Gesamtbevölkerung: So haben nur rund 28 Prozent der gering literalisierten Personen in den vergangenen zwölf Monaten an einer Weiterbildung teilgenommen. Vergleich: Von allen Erwachsenen besuchten knapp 47 Prozent eine Weiterbildung. 
     Von den gering literalisierten Erwachsenen sind rund 62 Prozent erwerbstätig. Diese sind weniger mit ihrer allgemeinen beruflichen Situation zufrieden als die Gesamtbevölkerung, ergibt die Studie. Hier sehe ich eine Möglichkeit für Angebote in der Erwachsenenbildung, die speziell für Leseschwache entwickelt werden. 
  • Sibilla Drews's picture

    Eine selbst bestimmte Teilhabe bedeutet auch, dass Menschen mit Behinderung in die Lage versetzt werden, Inhalte von Verträgen und anderen Dokumenten, die sie unterschreiben müssen, zu verstehen. Die Diakonie Mitteldeutschland hat in ihrem Erasmus+ Projekt "Redet mit uns, nicht über uns" Erläuterungen zu Vertragsdokumenten in leichter Sprache entwickelt:

    - Erläuterungen zur Teilnehmervereinbarung (link is external)in leichter Sprache

    - Erläuterungen zum Teilnehmerbericht (link is external)in leichter Sprache

    Mehr über das Projekt auf der Website (link is external) der NA beim BIBB.

  • Christine Bertram's picture
    Ich finde es schön und wichtig, dass das Thema nun auch auf EPALE angekommen ist! 
  • Tino BOUBARIS's picture
    Es ist richtig und wichtig, inklusive Erwachsenenbildung auf EPALE zu diskutieren. Aber gerne miteinander und nicht übereinander. Ich würde daher gerne dazu einladen, sich mit EPALE unter Gesichtspunkten wie Barrierefreiheit der EPALE Website, inklusive Lernangebote, zielgruppengerechte Ansprache u.v.m. auseinanderzusetzen.
  • Christine Bertram's picture
    Hallo Tino,

    Danke für die Anmerkung, die absolut korrekt ist. EPALE ist zur Zeit nicht barrierefrei. Ich kann dir versichern, dass hinter den Kulissen daran gearbeitet wird.