chevron-down chevron-left chevron-right chevron-up home circle comment double-caret-left double-caret-right like like2 twitter epale-arrow-up text-bubble cloud stop caret-down caret-up caret-left caret-right file-text

EPALE - E-Plattform für Erwachsenenbildung in Europa

Blog

Are adult learning providers “learning organisations"?

17/09/2015
von Andrew McCoshan
Sprache: EN

/de/file/learningorganisationsresizedjpgLearning Organisations

Learning Organisations

An important area in management literature related to quality concerns “learning organisations". This seems to be curiously overlooked in much of the literature related to quality in adult learning. Curious because quality systems are devoted to ensuring the provision of high-quality learning without apparently giving much attention to how adult learning providers might actually “do" learning themselves.

The first major contribution to the concept of organisational learning was made by Argyris and Schön in the late 1970s and made popular in the 1990s by Peter Senge. Argyris and Schön, defined the “learning organisation" as an organisation “with the ability to see things in new ways, gain new understandings and produce new patterns of behaviour–all on a continuing basis and in a new way that engages the organisation as a whole."  At the heart of the concept is the idea that new knowledge arises from tapping into tacit knowledge possessed by individuals and making it explicit. This is “double loop" learning (in “single loop" learning tacit assumptions and underlying mental models remain unchanged). Evidently, this offers the potential for learning providers to look at what they do in new ways.

A key issue for enterprises is therefore how they manage learning processes: “… organisational management requires the conversion of individual knowledge into explicit forms and their location at the level of the organisation. This leads to prescriptions to do with codifying and proceduralising knowledge so that it is available to all members of the organisation and not susceptible to loss when individuals leave".

This line of thinking calls for the adoption of new ways of working, as identified by Peter Senge (see box). Overall, it requires a shift away from hierarchical structures to new organisational forms such as networks and team working. This is good news for adult learning given the tendency for educators to work in such ways anyway (see my previous blog).

Some key features of the learning organisation

► Regular analysis of relationships in the organization and elimination of the obstacles to learning (‘systems thinking’).
► Mental models are challenged through an open culture that promotes inquiry and trust; unwanted values are discarded (‘unlearnt’).
► Individuals take responsibility for their own learning (‘personal mastery’) in a spirit of continuous self-improvement.
► Employees all share a common vision. Personal goals are aligned with the goals and vision of the organization.
► Dialogue and group discussion is important to enable teams to learn.

Source: adapted from Senge (1990)

At the same time, researchers have highlighted the challenges inherent in such developments. Both double and triple loop learning tend to require significant management and especially leadership. Capturing knowledge may “kill it" and organisations may need to make difficult choices between the relative pros and cons of codification versus personalisation of knowledge. Argyris has noted that organisations tend to approach organisational learning as an add-on to their work, as a checklist of prescriptive “to do" items.

Nonetheless, the ideas built into the learning organisation concept have great potential value, especially in non-formal adult learning which lacks “regulation" and where many good ideas probably fail to be recognised and developed systematically. The concept also has much to say about innovation which can be very important in a sector where changes in the needs of client groups are part of everyday life.

Andrew McCoshan has worked in education and training for over 20 years. For the last 10 years he has specialised in policy development studies and evaluations for the EU, and before that was a consultant in the UK. Andrew is currently a freelance consultant, an Associate with the UK Higher Education Academy, an ECVET Expert for the UK, and a Member of the UK Education & Employers Taskforce Research Group.

Schlagwörter:
Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Epale SoundCloud Share on LinkedIn Share on email